#!trpst#trp-gettext data-trpgettextoriginal=38#!trpen#Saltar al contenido#!trpst#/trp-gettext#!trpen#

DEMORESET

Our Work

Welcome to DemoRest the first deliberative democracy network in the global South, an initiative powered NED Endowerment for Democracy and Extituto de Política Abierta, a key component of our Democratic Innovation efforts.

Our path has been transformative since 2021. Here’s what we’ve achieved with DemoReset:

1. Collaborative
foundation:

 Gathered organizations to identify their needs and challenges.

2. Community
building

Through our exchange experiences sessions, organizations discovered mutual aspirations and resources.

3. Learning
and growth

The #DemoTALKS masterclasses emerged, to strengthen the knowledge about deliberation in other formats.

4. Innovation
in action

The DemoReset Lab was born, a space for trial, collaboration, and the creation of five innovative deliberation prototypes.

WHY THE SOUTH?

In the South we can find experience solutions, proposals, and practices that nurture democracy. While it strengthens the unique practices of each context, it also finds common ground between institutional and ancestral models of decision-making.

In a world where democracy is constantly questioned, and distrust in institutional and traditional forms of government is increasing, civil society provides an opportunity to deepen our exploration and reencounter the deliberative practices of the global South. The time has come to recognize how communities have developed unique forms of conversation, argumentation, and decision-making in different contexts, where global and local governance can thrive.

The South faces multiple challenges when it comes to deliberative processes.

The participating organizations stated that they encountered certain barriers to their deliberation processes, such as:

Cultural barriers:

Correspond strictly to the social, environmental, political, security and/or economic environment that may have hindered or determined the development of an initiative.

Organizational barriers:

Those faced by the organization in terms of available internal resources, whether economic, technical, technological or human.

Barriers to convening:

They are understood as those boundaries and biases that limited the type of population that participated in the initiative, ranging from accessibility, dissemination formats, language, logistics, etc. They are restricted only at the moment of defining and channeling the participating population.

Barriers to participation mechanisms:

These are those that condition the right to organize and dialogue, deliberate and influence the management of a public interest. They emphatically address the inclusion of actors, contexts, interests and objectives.

Barriers to decision making.

Among the deliberative processes, it is recognized as the most difficult moment, since the decision-making exercise requires prioritizing and/or discarding arguments and exposed needs, so these barriers address issues of coherence, inclusiveness, controversy closure, among others.

Knowledge management barriers:

Correspond to the management, systematization, analysis and processing of information or collective knowledge of the deliberation process and the communication of results.

Our goal from the Global South is to overcome adversity by implementing creative strategies, forging connections, decolonizing the past and weaving new conversations for a transformative future.

What is a differential deliberation practice?

At Demo.Reset ‘Differential Deliberation Practices’ allow us to recognize strengths and facilitate exchanges between organizations to learn from each other about their common challenges, understand that some are experts in engaging local communities, while others are strong in designing methodologies to enable deliberation as we weave and strengthen the bridges of this community of practice, Demo.Reset 2.0 becomes a compass that directs us to new encounters and adventures on the journey of deliberation in the global South.

PRACTICES

They are all those methodologies, processes, and/or tools developed and implemented by communities and civil society organizations with the intention of convening spaces for conversation and decision making on topics of common interest; between members of the community and/or with local authorities in which it is intended to achieve some type of the collective influence.

What differentiates the practices is related first of all to the specific origin of those who develop them: indigenous people, LGTBIQ+ population, groups or other forms of association between young people and movements or other forms of association and collaboration between women. The differential of the practices is related secondly; to the unique forms, procedures, aesthetics, and rituals that have been developed by the communities to carry out conversations, informed decision-making processes, and actions to influence local authorities. In this context, the differential is focused on recognizing and mapping the aspects of each practice: how does the word circulate? What role do bodies, images, symbols, and other aesthetics occupy? How is the memory of what was said built? How are the spaces distributed so that the conversation meets its objectives? Are decisions made? How are decisions made collectively?

Deliberation is understood as a conversation between diverse actors with diverse opinions in which the appropriate space, time, methodologies, and procedures are available so that the actors involved can carefully consider the pros and cons of a decision before adopting it, look for the best ways to express their opinions and/or influence the decisions of local authorities on a topic of common interest.

Now is the time!
Demo.Reset 2.0

In a world where democracy is constantly questioned, and distrust in institutional and traditional forms of government is increasing, civil society provides an opportunity to deepen our exploration and reencounter the deliberative practices of the global South.

It is time to recognize the diverse forms of conversation, argumentation and decision-making that communities have designed in different contexts, as spaces where global and local governance is nurtured.

If you want to be part of the collective action and transform the way we deliberate by overcoming obstacles in our territories. NOW IS THE TIME TO:

  1. CONNECT through networks among practitioners and experts.
  2. IDENTIFY the barriers to implementing deliberative democracy processes.
  3. CHARACTERIZE AND CREATE initiatives and solutions.

Click on the following button to know, learn and be part of Demoreset 2.0

What happened before?
DemoReset 1.0

In collaboration with the global office of the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) and the Extituto de Política Abierta in Colombia, Demo.Reset is created in 2021, a community of practice that articulates multiple actors in the global south to foster and strengthen collaboration and learning deliberative processes.

We’ve brought together insights from over 100 organizations across the Global South, including Sub-Saharan Africa, Eastern Europe, Southeast Asia, India, and Latin America, all with the common goal of revitalizing our democracies. HOW DID WE DO IT:

  1. EXPLORE unique solutions and practices from the global south.
  2. RECOGNIZING AND IDENTIFYING diverse governance methods and barriers
  3. CREATE PRACTICAL TOOLS AND SOLUTIONS to address the challenges organizations face when implementing democratic innovation.

Click on the following button to know, learn about of Demoreset 1.0

WHY THE SOUTH?

  1. Analysis: Identify the structural and functional obstacles preventing the effective implementation of deliberative democracy in the Global South. 
  2. Workshops: Exchange knowledge and experience.
  3. Protoypes: Design alternative models for deliberation and participation.
  4. Adaptation: Take up, use, adapt, organize and strengthen the models.
  5. Testing solutions and alternative models for deliberation.
  1. In-Depth Sessions/Residencies: Strengthening global deliberation processes.

Demo.Reset is at the forefront of changing how global communities practice deliberative democracy. 

Demo.Reset is at the forefront of changing how global communities practice deliberative democracy. 

Demo.Reset is at the forefront of changing how global communities practice deliberative democracy. 

WHAT’S NEW

Stay informed and be part of the deliberative democracy movement! Subscribe to our newsletter for exclusive updates, inspiring stories, and valuable insights.

Demo.Reset is at the forefront of changing how global communities practice deliberative democracy. 

Demo.Reset is at the forefront of changing how global communities practice deliberative democracy. 

Demo.Reset is at the forefront of changing how global communities practice deliberative democracy. 

Melisa Ross

PhD candidate at the Berlin Graduate School for Social Sciences (BGSS) of Humboldt University in Berlin, Germany, and a research fellow of the Healthier Democracies project led by Public Agenda in New York, USA. “My research focuses on the Latin- American left turn, postneoliberalism, citizen participation and democratic innovations”.

We’re happy to announce our latest call for applications, designed specifically for organizations from the Global South like yours, is NOW OPEN! 🚀 This is your chance to join us in strengthening democratic practices!

This is a great opportunity for increasing your organization’s impact! Don’t miss it!
Get started by reading our👉 terms of reference👈

🌟Let’s shape the future of democracy together! 🌟

Azucena Morán

Research associate at the Institute for Sustainability Research – Helmholtz Center Potsdam. Her transdisciplinary work explores deliberative and participatory responses to planetary challenges. She serves on the Editorial Board of Participedia and on the Steering Committee on Democratic Innovations of the European Consortium for Policy Research (ECPR).

Yanina Welp

Associate researcher at the Albert Hirschman Center on Democracy, Graduate Institute, Geneva (Switzerland) and editorial coordinator of Agenda Pública. Between 2016 and 2019 she was co-director of the Latin American Zurich Center, at the University of Zurich. She has a PhD in Political and Social Sciences from the Pompeu Fabra University (Barcelona, Spain) and a degree in Political Science and Social Communication Sciences, both from the University of Buenos Aires (Argentina). She obtained the Habilitation with the Venia Legendi in Latin American Studies from the University of St.Gallen (Switzerland). She is co-founder of the Red de Politólogas. She specializes in the study of political participation, a topic on which she has published books, articles, and book chapters.

Claudia Chwalisz

Claudia is the lead author of the first OECD report on deliberative democracy: Innovative Citizen Participation and New Democratic Institutions: Catching the Deliberative Wave (2020; co-authored with Ieva Cesnulaityte), and she led the development of the OECD Good Practice Principles for Deliberative Processes. She oversaw the development of the OECD Evaluation Guidelines for Representative Deliberative Processes (2021) is the author of a new OECD paper on Eight Ways to Institutionalise Deliberative Democracy (2021). She co-ordinated the OECD Innovative Citizen Participation Network of leading international practitioners, academics, public servants, artists, and designers, and she edited the OECD’s online digest Participo.

Yago Bermejo

Yago has been working on democratic participation projects for more than 10 years. He has experience in facilitation, process design and strategies for the use of democratic digital tools. From 2016 to 2019, he has been responsible for ParticipaLab, a democratic innovation laboratory, at Medialab Prado, in coordination with the Participation Area of the Madrid City Council, in which he has developed numerous projects related to Decide Madrid as well as the design of the Observatory of the City and the G1000 of Madrid, pioneering experiences in the use of lottery and deliberation in Spain.

Susan Lee

Susan is a student and democracy practitioner from Seoul, South Korea. In 2020, she co-founded the World Citizens’ Assembly, a prototype for a global citizen’s assembly based on iterative pilot testing, with Yago Bermejo Abati. In 2021, Deliberativa began co-incubating the Global Assembly, the first sortition-selected global citizens’ assembly in the lead-up to COP26. Deliberativa coordinated the delivery of pilot tests on multilingual virtual deliberation to inform the final Assembly design. As part of the Implementation Circle, Susan supported the recruitment and management of 100+ global partners to implement a decentralized sortition and train local hosts of Assembly participants. In the fall of 2021, she co-designed and implemented the deliberative process and output consolidation methodology. Susan has been the main spokesperson for the GA since the project launched; you can see some of Susan’s media work here and here. Susan is interested in imagining participative models of global governance, decolonizing deliberative democracy, and placing youth at the front of the deliberative wave.

Maria Paulina Ibarra

Executive Director of Fundación Multitudes, a non-profit organization based in Chile. She has global experience in transparency, citizen participation and accountability, having worked with organizations such as Open Government Partnership and the World Bank. She holds a BA in Communication from Marymount University, and an MA in Communication from Georgetown University.

Andre Noel Roth

He is a Political Scientist (1990), Master in Political Science (1994) and Doctor in Economic and Social Sciences, mention in Political Science (1999) from the Université de Genève-Switzerland. He has been professor of public policy analysis in Switzerland and in several universities in Colombia and Latin America. Since 2006, he is a Research Professor (currently tenured) attached to the Department of Political Science of the Faculty of Law, Political and Social Sciences (FDCPyS) of the National University of Colombia, Bogotá. He has held the positions of Coordinator of the Doctorate in Political Studies and International Relations, Director of the journal Ciencia Política, Director of the Instituto de Investigación Socio-jurídica UNIJUS and Vice-Dean of Research and Extension of the FDCPyS. He is also Director of the Research Group “Analysis of Public Policies and Public Management”. Public Policy and Public Management Analysis” (APPGP) (category B Colciencias 2021), Coordinator of the Innovation in Governance Innovation in Governance Laboratory (GobLab) of the FDCPyS, Co-coordinator of the group Comparative Public Policy group of ALACIP and Co-editor of the journal Mundos Plurales (FLACSO-Ecuador). Ecuador). He has published several books and dozens of chapters and articles on public policy and administration. administration.

HUB Eastern Europe

Connect with your Regional Mobilizer
Regional Leader: Melina Mohoric
Location: Dubrovnik, Croatia

Mosaic. Shaping Ideas into Success Stories.

Mission: Supporting cities, associations, and businesses in transforming ideas into successful projects. Mosaic specializes in participatory budgeting and inclusive work methodologies.
Contact https://mosaic.com.hr/

Info@Mosaic.com.hr
Zagreb: +385 99 536 1054
Dubrovnik:  +385 99 536 1054

Hub of Sub-Saharan Africa

Connect with your Regional Mobilizer
Regional Leader: Obi Jane

Location: Kaduna, Nigeria
Centre for Peace Advancement and Socio-Economic Development (CPAED)
Mission: Advocating for deliberative democracy, non-violent conflict management, and improving socio-economic conditions of women, youth, and children. 
Building Peace, transforming lives
Contact: https://cpaedng.org/
info@cpaedng.org

HUB Southeast Asia and India

Connect with your Regional Mobilizer

Regional Leader:Sanskriti Menon
Location: India
Organization: Centre for Environment Education (CEE)
Mission: Enhancing understanding of sustainable development. CEE focuses on innovative educational programs, building capacities for sustainable development.
Transforming Education for Sustainable Futuresn 
Contact: https://www.ceeindia.org/

HUB Latin America

Get to know the Latin America Organizations. 
Resurgentes Regional Leader: 


Mission: Implementing four climate assemblies in vulnerable Latin American cities. 
Consortium Resurgentes is forging alliances for impactful climate change agenda.

Consorcio de Localidades en Acción CILA 

Asuntos de Sur, Argentina https://asuntosdelsur.org/
Fundación Ciudadanía Inteligente, Chile https://ciudadaniai.org/
Procomum, Brasil https://www.procomum.org/
Extituto de Política Abierta, Colombia https://www.extituto.com/

Mission: Promoting collective intelligence on citizen deliberation in Latin America, presenting joint projects for environmental agendas with a gender perspective.

DELIBERATION

Deliberation is understood as a conversation among diverse actors and with diverse opinions in which space, time, methodologies and procedures are available so that the actors involved can carefully consider the pros and cons of a decision before adopting it, seek the best ways to express their opinions and/or influence the decisions of local authorities on a topic of common interest.

DIFFERENTIAL

  • The differential of the practices is related in the first place to the specific community origin of those who develop them: Indigenous peoples, LGTBIQ+ Communities, collectives or other forms of association and collaboration between young people, women and social movements.
  • The differential of the practices is related in second place; with the singular forms, procedures, aesthetics and rituals, which have been developed by the communities to carry out conversations, processes of informed decision making and actions of influence on local authorities. In this context, the differential is centered on recognizing and mapping the aspects of each practice: How does the word circulate, what procedures are used to better “understand” the problems among all those involved, what role do bodies, images, symbols, other aesthetics play, how is the memory of what is said constructed, how are spaces distributed so that the conversation is conducive, how is time managed for the conversation, are decisions made, how is the conversation carried out, and how is it carried out?

PRACTICE

It is that methodology, process, space and/or tool developed and implemented by communities and civil society organizations with the intention of convening spaces for conversation and decision making on issues of common interest; among community members and/or with local authorities in which it is intended to achieve some kind of collective influence.